lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:19:27 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <>
To:	Ingo Molnar <>
Cc:	Anthony Liguori <>,, netdev <>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] QEMU PIC indirection patch for in-kernel APIC work

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 23:21 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Anthony Liguori <> wrote:
> > But why is it a good thing to do PV drivers in the kernel?  You lose 
> > flexibility and functionality to gain performance. [...]
> in Linux a kernel-space network driver can still be tunneled over 
> user-space code, and hence you can add arbitrary add-on functionality 
> (and thus have flexibility), without slowing down the common case (which 
> would be to tunnel the guest's network traffic into the firewall rules 
> of the kernel. No need to touch user-space for any of that).

You didn't quote Anthony's point about "it's more about there not being
good enough userspace interfaces to do network IO."

It's easier to write a kernel-space network driver, but it's not
obviously the right thing to do until we can show that an efficient
packet-level userspace interface isn't possible.  I don't think that's
been done, and it would be interesting to try.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists