lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 00:49:47 -0400 From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>, davem@...emloft.net, mingo@...e.hu, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFT] proxy arp deadlock possible On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 06:10:42PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 10:44 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > > Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > Thanks Dave, there is a classic AB BA deadlock here. > > > We should break the dependency like this. > > > > > > Could someone who uses proxy ARP test this? > > > > Sorry Stephen, this isn't necessary. The lockdep thing is > > simply confused here. It's treating tbl->proxy_queue as the > > same thing as neigh->arp_queue when they're clearly different. > > > > I'm disappointed that after all this time lockdep is still > > producing bogus reports like this. I'm sure we've been > > through this particular issue many times already. > > > what's the exact lockdep output here? http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg35266.html Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists