lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 12:26:56 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] QEMU PIC indirection patch for in-kernel APIC work * Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com> wrote: > > so right now the only option for a clean codebase is the KVM > > in-kernel code. > > I strongly disagree with this. are you disagreeing with my statement that the KVM kernel-side code is the only clean codebase here? To me this is a clear fact :) I only pointed out that the only clean codebase at the moment is the KVM in-kernel code - i did not make the argument (at all) that every new piece of KVM code should be done in the kernel. That would be stupid - do you think i'd advocate for example moving command line argument parsing into the kernel? and as i said in the mail: "the kernel _is_ the best place to do this particular stuff". Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists