[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070405115807.GB10972@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 21:58:07 +1000
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Gagan Arneja <gaagaan@...il.com>,
Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tg3 reset_task question
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 10:10:07PM +0000, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> > > Yes, you're right. Perhaps we should get the rtnl first before
> > > tg3_full_lock(), or turn irq_sync into an atomic counter that allows
> > > nesting.
>
> When you start reinventing windows locks or the BKL, you know
> you are going down the wrong path
Actually, I think what Michael's suggesting is quite different.
This would be a simple counter that tells the IRQ handlers to
not process any events. So this isn't really a lock as such.
FWIW I think the counter sounds better than using the RTNL since
with the latter you'd have to figure out whether you're in an
RTNL context or not (e.g., tg3_suspend would also need to grab it).
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists