netdev - Re: HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute commands lockup whole system]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1175736808.4068.4.camel@localhost>
Date:	Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:33:28 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Denys <denys@...p.net.lb>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HTB/act_mirred problem [was: one more... iproute
	commands	lockup whole system]

On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 16:50 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> Anyway, we can't return NET_XMIT_SUCCESS, so how about just returning
> NET_XMIT_BYPASS in all cases where the packet was stolen/dropped/...
> by TC actions?

Ok, I think i get you now. Yes, that would work, but:
for the dropped case, you need to record into the dropped stats (unlike
the the other two).

> > I can
> > go back and look at my notes to be certain. At one point i posted those
> > notes, it maybe time to add them to the kernel code or doc somewhere.
> 
> 
> In case they're still up to date, adding them somewhere under
> Documentation/ sounds good.

I think it is still uotodate, if not i will make sure it is before i
submit it.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html