[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adak5wp6x1m.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 13:57:25 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@...ibm.com>,
Dmitry Mishin <dim@...nvz.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver
> +/*
> + * The higher levels take care of making this non-reentrant (it's
> + * called with bh's disabled).
> + */
> +static int etun_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *tx_dev)
You have this comment, but then...
> + dev->features = NETIF_F_FRAGLIST
> + | NETIF_F_HIGHDMA
> + | NETIF_F_LLTX;
you set LLTX, which means that the upper layers _don't_ make sure that
your xmit routine is not reentrant.
It looks like the impact of multiple simultaneous xmit calls is just
the possibility of screwing up the statistics, but still I think you
want to drop the LLTX feature (since you have no lock of your own to
try and take).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists