netdev - Re: [kvm-devel] QEMU PIC indirection patch for in-kernel APIC work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1176087018.11664.65.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 12:50:18 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] QEMU PIC indirection patch for in-kernel APIC work

On Sun, 2007-04-08 at 08:36 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Hi Avi,
> >
> > 	I don't think you've thought about this very hard.  The receive copy is
> > completely independent with whether the packet is going to the guest via
> > a kernel driver or via userspace, so not relevant.
> >   
> 
> A packet received in the kernel cannot be made available to userspace in 
> a safe manner without a copy, as it will not be aligned with page 
> boundaries, so userspace cannot examine the packet until after one copy 
> has occured.

Hi Avi!

	I'm a little puzzled by your response.  Hmm...

	lguest's userspace network frontend does exactly as many copies as
Ingo's in-host-kernel code.  One from the Guest, one to the Guest.

Does that clarify?
Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html