netdev - Re: two gateways with one NIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070409145403.GB2299@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2007 10:54:03 -0400
From:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To:	W Agtail <wagtail@....ie>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: two gateways with one NIC

On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 08:29:07PM +0100, W Agtail wrote:
> This is what I'm trying to achieve with the following iptables/iproute2
> configuration on both web servers:
> 
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 8088 -i eth0 -j LOG
> --log-prefix "fwmark 1: "
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 8089 -i eth0 -j LOG
> --log-prefix "fwmark 2: "
> 
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 8088 -i eth0 -j MARK
> --set-mark 1
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 8089 -i eth0 -j MARK
> --set-mark 2

You are supposed to mangle things _coming_ from port 8088 and 8089.
After all it is the replies you are trying to affect, not the requests.
So it should be the --sport not --dport.  And of course outbound not
incoming on eth0.

> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 1 -j LOG --log-prefix
> "marked 1: "
> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m mark --mark 2 -j LOG --log-prefix
> "marked 2: "
> 
> ip route add table 1 default via 10.18.35.11 dev eth0 # GW1
> ip route add table 2 default via 10.18.35.21 dev eth0 # GW2
> 
> ip rule add fwmark 1 table 1
> ip rule add fwmark 2 table 2
> 
> On web2, the default gw is set to gw2 and in /var/log/messages, I can
> see packets appear to be marked. However, for some reason, 8088 is still
> routing back via gw2 (default gw) rather than being routed via gw1,
> which I'm trying to do with the above ip rules etc.
> 
> Is the above the correct syntax? or I guess I could totally be missing
> the plot?
> 
> Many thanks for your time on this one.

Hope that helps.

--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html