netdev - Re: two gateways with one NIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070409161932.GA2302@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
Date:	Mon, 9 Apr 2007 12:19:32 -0400
From:	lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen)
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	W Agtail <wagtail@....ie>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: two gateways with one NIC

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 06:13:50PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> As the name suggests, POSTROUTING comes after routing, so marking
> packets there doesn't affect routing. Use PREROUTING for forwarded
> traffic and OUTPUT for locally generated traffic.

I didn't even notice that had been changed.  It used to say PREROUTING
when it was for --dport, and all I suggested changing was --dport to
--sport and change the -o part (probably to nothing at all really since
routing hasn't been decided yet).

Yes it absolutely has to be done PREROUTING.

--
Len Sorensen
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html