netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	greearb@...delatech.com
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, johannes@...solutions.net, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	kuznet@....inr.ac.ru, dlezcano@...ibm.com, dim@...nvz.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver

From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:14:52 -0700

> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
> > It would be nice if someone would finally come up with a generic
> > interface based on netlink (RTM_NEWLINK) instead of adding yet
> > another couple of homegrown interfaces.
> 
> My preference is for ioctls, procfs, or similar that does not
> require extra libraries.  Ethtool is an ioctl based approach,
> so that could potentially be used, though I'm not sure if
> that's the right place to put it...

I totally disagree.

Netlink doesn't require libraries, the libraries just make using it
easier.  It's a simple protocol sent over a socket, if you include
the right headers you can do it all yourself.

We shouldn't fail to use our proper core network configuration
interface just because it's inconvenient for you.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html