[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1176204297.8459.86.camel@johannes.berg>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:24:57 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
dim@...nvz.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
containers@...ts.osdl.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Add etun driver
On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 13:09 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> I know :) It was a few month ago when I noticed the new bonding
> sysfs interface when I first thought that we really need this.
:)
> > I don't think wireless can get away without a new tool. So much stuff
> > there. Look at
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-dev.git;a=blob;f=include/linux/nl80211.h;hb=HEAD
>
>
> Maybe not wireless, but bonding, briding, vlan, etun, possibly more.
Fair enough. Then the question however remains whether wireless should
try to do all things it needs in one or try leveraging multiple things
from other places. Thoughts?
johannes
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists