[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200704131504.l3DF4lYF031824@faith.austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 10:04:47 -0500
From: Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, jmorris@...ei.org
Subject: PATCH[1/1]: kernel panic when large security contexts in ACQUIRE
When sending a security context of 50+ characters in an ACQUIRE
message, following kernel panic occurred.
kernel BUG in xfrm_send_acquire at net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1781!
cpu 0x3: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c0000000421bb2e0]
pc: c00000000033b074: .xfrm_send_acquire+0x240/0x2c8
lr: c00000000033b014: .xfrm_send_acquire+0x1e0/0x2c8
sp: c0000000421bb560
msr: 8000000000029032
current = 0xc00000000fce8f00
paca = 0xc000000000464b00
pid = 2303, comm = ping
kernel BUG in xfrm_send_acquire at net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:1781!
enter ? for help
3:mon> t
[c0000000421bb650] c00000000033538c .km_query+0x6c/0xec
[c0000000421bb6f0] c000000000337374 .xfrm_state_find+0x7f4/0xb88
[c0000000421bb7f0] c000000000332350 .xfrm_tmpl_resolve+0xc4/0x21c
[c0000000421bb8d0] c0000000003326e8 .xfrm_lookup+0x1a0/0x5b0
[c0000000421bba00] c0000000002e6ea0 .ip_route_output_flow+0x88/0xb4
[c0000000421bbaa0] c0000000003106d8 .ip4_datagram_connect+0x218/0x374
[c0000000421bbbd0] c00000000031bc00 .inet_dgram_connect+0xac/0xd4
[c0000000421bbc60] c0000000002b11ac .sys_connect+0xd8/0x120
[c0000000421bbd90] c0000000002d38d0 .compat_sys_socketcall+0xdc/0x214
[c0000000421bbe30] c00000000000869c syscall_exit+0x0/0x40
--- Exception: c00 (System Call) at 0000000007f0ca9c
SP (fc0ef8f0) is in userspace
We are using size of security context from xfrm_policy to determine
how much space to alloc skb and then putting security context from
xfrm_state into skb. Should have been using size of security context
from xfrm_state to alloc skb. Following fix does that
Please let me know if this is acceptable.
Patch was built and tested against 2.6.21-rc6-git5.
Regards,
Joy
Signed-off-by: Joy Latten <latten@...tin.ibm.com>
diff -urpN linux-2.6.20/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c linux-2.6.20.patch/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
--- linux-2.6.20/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c 2007-04-12 15:12:27.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.20.patch/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c 2007-04-13 09:32:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -272,9 +272,8 @@ static int attach_encap_tmpl(struct xfrm
}
-static inline int xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(struct xfrm_policy *xp)
+static inline int xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(struct xfrm_sec_ctx *xfrm_ctx)
{
- struct xfrm_sec_ctx *xfrm_ctx = xp->security;
int len = 0;
if (xfrm_ctx) {
@@ -2170,7 +2169,7 @@ static int xfrm_send_acquire(struct xfrm
len = RTA_SPACE(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) * xp->xfrm_nr);
len += NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_acquire));
- len += RTA_SPACE(xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(xp));
+ len += RTA_SPACE(xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(x->security));
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
len += RTA_SPACE(sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_type));
#endif
@@ -2280,7 +2279,7 @@ static int xfrm_exp_policy_notify(struct
len = RTA_SPACE(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_tmpl) * xp->xfrm_nr);
len += NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(struct xfrm_user_polexpire));
- len += RTA_SPACE(xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(xp));
+ len += RTA_SPACE(xfrm_user_sec_ctx_size(xp->security));
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM_SUB_POLICY
len += RTA_SPACE(sizeof(struct xfrm_userpolicy_type));
#endif
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists