| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <46246572.9020108@snapgear.com> Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:13:06 +1000 From: Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com> To: Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@...hlab.com> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: bug in tcp? Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote: > Weird. Why does sending a message from the client make it go again? The rule that allows packets with an "ESTABLISHED" state only matches packets for which the connection is in netfilter's conntrack table. The connection is removed from the table after the 5 days of idle. It is only added again if netfilter accepts a packet for that connection. So the packet from the client will cause it to be added. > If that's the case, it seems like a simple fix would be to enable TCP > keepalive in my app, that would keep netfilter from timing out, right? > That seems better than extending the netfilter timeout. Yes that would work. > How do people normally handle this? Change the timeout or use keepalives. I can't think of any other way. The 5 days is a compromise between keeping valid connections and timing out dead connections. There will always be connections for which it times out too fast or too slow. I don't think there are any drawbacks to increasing the timeout if you aren't a router, but as long as there is a timeout, you need keepalives to be sure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists