netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] [SCTP] Fix assertion (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070417.125330.132931482.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:53:30 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vladislav.yasevich@...com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, t-fujii@...jp.nec.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [SCTP] Fix assertion
 (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) failed message

From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:21:23 -0400

> From: Tsutomu Fujii <t-fujii@...jp.nec.com>
> 
> In current implementation, LKSCTP does receive buffer accounting for
> data in sctp_receive_queue and pd_lobby. However, LKSCTP don't do
> accounting for data in frag_list when data is fragmented. In addition,
> LKSCTP doesn't do accounting for data in reasm and lobby queue in
> structure sctp_ulpq.
> When there are date in these queue, assertion failed message is printed
> in inet_sock_destruct because sk_rmem_alloc of oldsk does not become 0
> when socket is destroyed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Fujii <t-fujii@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>

Patch applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html