[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070418231808.GF13146@hovland.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:18:15 -0700
From: Erik Hovland <erik@...land.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make dev_kfree_skb_any check if the skb is valid
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 03:44:16PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Erik Hovland <erik@...land.org>
> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:33:44 -0700
>
> > If dev_kfree_skb_any is called and it then calls dev_kfree_skb_irq.
> > That call will dereference the skb. If the skb is invalid, down the
> > drain we go.
> >
> > This one-liner checks to see if the skb is valid as part of the
> > determination of whether to call dev_kfree_skb_irq.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Erik Hovland <erik@...land.org>
>
> This should never be invoked with a NULL skb argument.
>
> Who is doing that?
Heh, the reason I came up with this patch is that the code in
drivers/usb/gadget/ether.c at about line 1653 will attempt to allocate
an skb. If it fails then it uses a goto to jump to line 1672 where it
will call dev_kfree_skb_any (skb) on a potentially null skb. I put a
validity check there and sent it off to the USB gadget maintainer. He
asked me to instead make the dev_kfree_skb_any call more robust and see
how that went over on the netdev list. Like a lead balloon?
E
--
Erik Hovland
mail: erik@...land.org
web: http://hovland.org/
PGP/GPG public key available on request
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists