lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:14:23 +0200
From:	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...ru,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.osdl.org, devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [BRIDGE] Unaligned access on IA64 when comparing ethernet
 addresses

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> 
> Although I don't think gcc does anything fancy since we don't
> use memcmp().  It's a tradeoff, we'd like to use unsigned long
> comparisons when both objects are aligned correctly but we also
> don't want it to use any more than one potentially mispredicted
> branch.

Again, memcmp() *cannot* be optimized, because its semantic is to compare bytes.

memcpy() can take into account alignement if known at compile time, not memcmp()

http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2007/03/13/31


> 
> We could add some alignment tests to the ethernet address
> comparison code, but it's probably more trouble than it's
> worth.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
-- 
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists