netdev - Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1hcrcmkh9.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 09:50:42 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	"<Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>, containers@...ts.osdl.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream

David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>
>> What is the ETA on your patches?
>
> That depends on Dave Miller now, I think.  I'm assuming they need to go
> through the network GIT tree to get to Linus.  Certainly Andrew Morton seems
> to think so.

Ok.  I don't see any patches in -mm so I was assuming these patches have
not been queued up anywhere.

As long as these things happen in a reasonably timely manner so I can
remove the export of kernel_thread and kill daemonize I really don't care.

If you have written them they are quite likely better then my minimal
patches which were quite restrained because of my limited ability to
test these things.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html