lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <>
Subject: Re: [BRIDGE] Unaligned access on IA64 when comparing ethernet

From: Eric Dumazet <>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 16:14:23 +0200

> On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 13:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <> wrote:
> > 
> > Although I don't think gcc does anything fancy since we don't
> > use memcmp().  It's a tradeoff, we'd like to use unsigned long
> > comparisons when both objects are aligned correctly but we also
> > don't want it to use any more than one potentially mispredicted
> > branch.
> Again, memcmp() *cannot* be optimized, because its semantic is to compare bytes.
> memcpy() can take into account alignement if known at compile time, not memcmp()

I was prehaps thinking about strlen() where I know several
implementations work a word at a time even though it is
a byte-based operation:

#define LO_MAGIC 0x01010101
#define HI_MAGIC 0x80808080
	 sethi	%hi(HI_MAGIC), %o4
	 or	%o4, %lo(HI_MAGIC), %o3
	 sethi	%hi(LO_MAGIC), %o4
	 or	%o4, %lo(LO_MAGIC), %o2
	ld	[%o0], %o5
	sub	%o5, %o2, %o4
	andcc	%o4, %o3, %g0
	be,pt	%icc, 8b
	 add	%o0, 4, %o0

I figured some similar trick could be done with strcmp() and
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists