lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:38:05 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, ebiederm@...ssion.com, containers@...ts.osdl.org, oleg@...sign.ru, hch@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: Getting the new RxRPC patches upstream On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:41:46 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote: > There are only two non-net patches that AF_RXRPC depends on: > > (1) The key facility changes. That's all my code anyway, and shouldn't be a > problem to merge unless someone else has put some changes in there that I > don't know about. > > (2) try_to_cancel_delayed_work(). I suppose I could use > cancel_delayed_work() instead, but that's less efficient as it waits for > the timer completion function to finish. There are significant workqueue changes in -mm and I plan to send them in for 2.6.22. I doubt if there's anything in there which directly affects cancel_delayed_work(), but making changes of this nature against 2.6.21 might lead to grief. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists