lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Hg3Xa-0003gF-Vk@highlab.com>
Date:	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:45:34 -0600
From:	Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@...hlab.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: bug in my understanding (was Re: bug in tcp?)

Sebastian Kuzminsky <seb@...hlab.com> wrote:
> Philip Craig <philipc@...pgear.com> wrote:
> > Change the timeout or use keepalives.  I can't think of any other way.
> > The 5 days is a compromise between keeping valid connections and
> > timing out dead connections.  There will always be connections for
> > which it times out too fast or too slow.  I don't think there are
> > any drawbacks to increasing the timeout if you aren't a router,
> > but as long as there is a timeout, you need keepalives to be sure.
> 
> Thanks!  I'll add keepalives and rerun the tests, and I expect the
> problem to go away.

I reran the tests with keepalive enabled and it worked just fine.
Thanks for all your help, and sorry for the false alarm!


-- 
Sebastian Kuzminsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ