| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 16:08:37 -0700 From: "Laurent Chavey" <chavey@...gle.com> To: hadi@...erus.ca Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: is CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT always set ? sorry for the trick question. I was simply making a modification to the skb tap code to allow tcpdump to work on the slave interface and not just the bonded one. The code change requires a change to the for loop code and it follow on to the call to deliver_skb(). In the process of adding the code, I noticed that if (at least that is how I read the code) CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not defined then the last pt_prev is call after the diverter and bridge code have handled the skb. This would only occur for bridged skb that one wanted to tap. On 4/23/07, jamal <hadi@...erus.ca> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-23-04 at 14:19 -0700, Laurent Chavey wrote: > > if CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT is not defined, then is the > > code below correct ? > > The simple answer is yes; > Is something not working for you? > > It is hard to read your question my good friend because it comes out > like a trick question;-> > It is more useful to say: > "I think this code is broken because ...." > And even more useful if you add: > "I have run the following testcases to illustrate blah ..." > Then if something is broken, and you want to be popular, you say: > "netdevers, heres the fix" > > Anyways, what is the problem? > > cheers, > jamal > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists