| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <462DBC7A.4010600@bx.jp.nec.com> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 17:14:50 +0900 From: Keiichi KII <k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> CC: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH -mm take4 2/6] support multiple logging >> We don't really have anything that corresponds to netpoll's >> connections at higher levels. >> >> I'm tempted to say we should make this work more like the dummy >> network device. ie: >> >> modprobe netconsole -o netcon1 [params] >> modprobe netconsole -o netcon2 [params] > > The configuration of netconsole's looks like the configuration of routes. > Granted you probably have more routes than netconsoles, but the interface > issues are similar. Netlink with a small application wouldn't be nice. > And having /proc/net/netconsole (read-only) would be good for the netlink > impaired. Do you say that we had better use procfs instead of sysfs to show the configurations of netconsole? If so, I have a question. I thought that "procfs use things related to process as far as possible". Is it no problem to use procfs here? -- Keiichi KII NEC Corporation OSS Promotion Center E-mail: k-keiichi@...jp.nec.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists