netdev - Re: sysctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1ejm8qkky.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:13:01 -0600
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sysctls

David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:

> From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
> Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:06:34 -0600
>
>> David for clarity do you happen to know of anyone using binary
>> sysctl values?
>
> None at all.
>
>> In particular is there any reason not to use CTL_UNNUMBERED
>> for new networking sysctls?
>
> Neil said he would send me a patch to do that.

Thanks. I just wanted to be certain I wasn't missing something,
when asking people not to use binary sysctl values.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html