netdev - Re: [patch 09/11] forcedeth: improve NAPI logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:24:16 -0400
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>
CC:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [patch 09/11] forcedeth: improve NAPI logic

Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
> I don't see why the NAPI handler needs to process tx packets. The ISR 
> will handle all tx processing.

It is a design choice, not a requirement.

Moving non-RX interrupt processing to the NAPI handler can help as loads 
increase.  The basic idea is to do as much work as possible in the NAPI 
handler with NIC interrupts masked.  That mitigates global system 
per-interrupt overhead even more than an only-RX NAPI scheme.

Several net drivers do TX completion handling in the NAPI handler.

	Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html