[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704262219200.18515@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:30:53 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
cc: Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unexcepted latency (order of 100-200 ms) with TCP (packet receive)
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > ...I'm unsure how to continue the investigation from this point onward
> > and asking for ideas/suggestions or how to rule out more possibilities...
> > Or is there some knob which I don't know of that should be toggled or
> > something, is 2.6 network stack expected to behave this way?
> >
>
> Try a different network adapter.
Hmm, I thought I had already done this but I just noticed that it is so
that the adapter was still the same as the other host has two adapter (now
that I look again). I'll give it a try tomorrow to see if using the
another adapter makes any difference.
> Try turning off hardware TSO offload:
> ethtool -K ethX tso off
# ethtool -K eth0 tso off
Cannot set device tcp segmentation offload settings: Operation not
supported
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists