lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704262219200.18515@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 22:30:53 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
cc:	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unexcepted latency (order of 100-200 ms) with TCP (packet receive)

On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:

> Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > ...I'm unsure how to continue the investigation from this point onward 
> > and asking for ideas/suggestions or how to rule out more possibilities... 
> > Or is there some knob which I don't know of that should be toggled or 
> > something, is 2.6 network stack expected to behave this way?
> > 
> 
> Try a different network adapter.

Hmm, I thought I had already done this but I just noticed that it is so 
that the adapter was still the same as the other host has two adapter (now 
that I look again). I'll give it a try tomorrow to see if using the 
another adapter makes any difference.

> Try turning off hardware TSO offload:
>   ethtool -K ethX tso off

# ethtool -K eth0 tso off
Cannot set device tcp segmentation offload settings: Operation not 
supported

-- 
 i.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ