netdev - Re: IPV6 source routing patch is still broken?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070426.150434.91313967.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:04:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	cebbert@...hat.com
Cc:	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPV6 source routing patch is still broken?

From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:53:58 -0400

> And what does this do?
> 
> +	switch (hdr->type) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
> +		break;
> +#endif
> 
> break by itself like that doesn't do anything. If it did
> then people with mobile ipv6 enabled would always accept all
> source routing. (They should at least know that's a problem.)

We are aware of this part already, and I've sent the fix to
the -stable folks and Linus so we can figure out how to deal
with this and the netlink OOPS'er too.

To be honest I don't blame anyone but the compiler, it shouldn't
accept that code without at least a warning.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html