netdev - Re: IPV6 source routing patch is still broken?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46313180.6040809@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Apr 2007 19:10:56 -0400
From:	Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: IPV6 source routing patch is still broken?

David Miller wrote:
> From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@...hat.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 17:53:58 -0400
> 
>> And what does this do?
>>
>> +	switch (hdr->type) {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6
>> +		break;
>> +#endif
>>
>> break by itself like that doesn't do anything. If it did
>> then people with mobile ipv6 enabled would always accept all
>> source routing. (They should at least know that's a problem.)
> 
> We are aware of this part already, and I've sent the fix to
> the -stable folks and Linus so we can figure out how to deal
> with this and the netlink OOPS'er too.
> 

Another question: is it a good idea to even be shipping release
kernels with Mobile IPV6 enabled? Unfortunately, "experimental"
isn't enough to go by...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html