[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adaps5qo6hh.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:12:42 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Steve Wise <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, divy@...lsio.com, general@...ts.openfabrics.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.22 5/5] iw_cxgb3: Update required firmware revision to 4.0.0.
> Update required firmware revision to 4.0.0.
Hmm... should we fold this into the earlier patch, which actually
needs this new FW? Or at least merge this patch first?
Also, is it cool with everyone to require a new FW, even for users who
might not be using (or even building) the RDMA driver? I'm not sure
what a good solution would be really, so maybe the pain of forcing
everyone to update FW is the least bad thing to do.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists