lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:43:47 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com> To: hadi@...erus.ca CC: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, cramerj <cramerj@...el.com>, "Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>, "Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior jamal wrote: > Heres the way i see it from a user perspective: > If a NIC has 3 hardware queues; if that NIC supports strict priority > (i.e the prio qdisc) which we already support, there should be no need > for the user to really explicitly enable that support. > It should be transparent to them - because by configuring a multi queue > prio qdisc (3 bands/queues default), they are already doing multiqueues. Agreed. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists