netdev - RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D5C1322C3E673F459512FB59E0DDC32902BCE1E6@orsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:46:36 -0700
From:	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>
To:	"Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>, <hadi@...erus.ca>
Cc:	"Patrick McHardy" <kaber@...sh.net>,
	"Stephen Hemminger" <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "cramerj" <cramerj@...el.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

> jamal wrote:
> > Heres the way i see it from a user perspective:
> > If a NIC has 3 hardware queues; if that NIC supports strict 
> priority 
> > (i.e the prio qdisc) which we already support, there should 
> be no need 
> > for the user to really explicitly enable that support.
> > It should be transparent to them - because by configuring a multi 
> > queue prio qdisc (3 bands/queues default), they are already 
> doing multiqueues.
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> 	Jeff
>

Then for clarification, are you asking that I remove the "multiqueue"
option to TC and sch_prio, and have it behave the way it did a few
patches ago?

Thanks,

-PJ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html