[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46343D9A.8010201@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 23:39:22 -0700
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [GIT PATCH net-2.6.23] IPV6: Configurable IPv6 address
selection policy table (RFC3484)
David Miller wrote:
> One idea is to have glibc have some kind of socket open, subscribed
> to a group which gets "sticky" events.
I don't quite yet know the context but I have to intervene: keeping
sockets open is not good. This will only cause problems.
Any interface must be memory based. Something like "register a word
which is set when an event arrives" is a much better interface. Who you
then go and retrieve messages is another issue. If this is a rare event
then opening is new netlink socket is no problem.
--
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (252 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists