[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4637A0B1.20900@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 16:18:57 -0400
From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
To: Isaula Oscar-QOI000 <Oscar.Isaula@...orola.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [SCTP] Initialization collision problem
Isaula Oscar-QOI000 wrote:
> Vlad,
>
> I finally got test results for the changes you suggested. The original
> issue is fixed and I have not detected any side effects.
Thanks.
-vlad
>
> Thanks,
> Oscar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@...r.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of Vlad Yasevich
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 9:45 AM
> To: Isaula Oscar-QOI000
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [SCTP] Initialization collision problem
>
> Hi Oscar
>
> Isaula Oscar-QOI000 wrote:
>> I ran into a problem where LKSCTP is reporting a SCTM_COMM_UP
>> indication to the User application but is giving back a value of zero
>> for the assoc_id.
>>
>> Attached are the SCTP debugs for the period in question.
>>
>> A couple of things that I would like to note about my setup. One is
>> that I'm running Kernel version 2.6.10 (I know is old but I can't move
>
>> to a newer version due to custom drivers). The second thing is that
>> the link between the two SCTP node is a very noisy and some messages
>> are getting lost (i.e. the INIT_ACK from the peer in this particular
> case).
>
> Can you give this patch a try and let me know if this fixes your issue?
>
> Thanks
> -vlad
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists