netdev - Re: netfront for review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178079783.28659.183.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 02 May 2007 14:23:02 +1000
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: netfront for review

On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 13:51 +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:37:13PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> >
> > > +static int xennet_change_mtu(struct net_device *dev, int mtu)
> > > +{
> > > +	int max = xennet_can_sg(dev) ? 65535 - ETH_HLEN : ETH_DATA_LEN;
> >
> > This seems odd to me: just because a device does TSO should we really
> > allow huge mtu settings?  Herbert?
> 
> Actually this has nothing to do with TSO/GSO.  This driver inherently
> supports arbitrary MTUs that's only limited by our network stack.  If
> the physical network device can't handle it you'll just get an ICMP
> error back or fragmentation.

Oops, I misread "xennet_can_sg" as a test for GSO.

Thanks for the clarification,
Rusty.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html