[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46388562.9050305@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 14:34:42 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@...ru>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.osdl.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>, devel@...nvz.org,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Virtual ethernet device (tunnel)
Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Veth stands for Virtual ETHernet. It is a simple tunnel driver
> that works at the link layer and looks like a pair of ethernet
> devices interconnected with each other.
>
> Mainly it allows to communicate between network namespaces but
> it can be used as is as well.
>
> Eric recently sent a similar driver called etun. This
> implementation is closer to the OpenVZ one and it lacks
> some unimportant features of etun driver (like ethtool_ops)
> for simplicity.
>
> The general difference from etun is that a netlink interface
> is used to create and destroy the pairs. The patch for an
> ip utility is also provided.
Thats a lot better than using sysfs, but I think it would be
preferrable to use rtnetlink instead of genetlink for network
configuration.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists