lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 May 2007 20:05:43 +0200
From:	Segher Boessenkool <>
To:	Scott Wood <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gianfar: Add I/O barriers when touching buffer descriptor ownership.

>> AFAICS you need stronger barriers though; {w,r,}mb(),
>> to prevent _any_ reordering of those memory accesses,
>> not just the compiler-generated ones.
> My impression was that the eieio used by iobarrier would be sufficient 
> for that, as we're not trying to synchronize between accesses to 
> different types of memory.  Is sync really required here?

For accesses to main system memory, eieio only orders
writes, not reads, so iobarrier_r() doesn't do what
you want; and iobarrier_w() isn't meant to be used for
main memory access ordering either.

Also, it is better to not use powerpc-specific interfaces
in a device driver if you don't have a strong reason to.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists