netdev - Re: [PATCH][XFRM] SAD info TLV aggregation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178197316.4077.4.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 03 May 2007 09:01:56 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][XFRM] SAD info TLV aggregation

On Thu, 2007-03-05 at 02:15 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:

> 
> I think using attributes here

"here" as in SAD or SPD as well?

>  wasn't a bad idea since this exports
> things that are implementation details and might need to be changed
> or extended at some point.

I think it may be reasonable to group the Hash info in one TLV
and the IPSEC specific info in a separate TLV - is this what you are
saying? Be explicit so i dont have to redo the patch over and over.
The other way to look at it is in the future, a new TLV could be added
that replaces the current one.

> In any case consistent naming here would be nice (SAD_ vs. SADXXX).

yes, i need to make this change on the SPD as well. Dave hold onto both
patches - i will resend.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html