[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178303538.2767.9.camel@lappy>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 20:32:18 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...elEye.com>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/40] mm: kmem_cache_objsize
On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 11:30 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 4 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > > Ok so you really need the number of objects per page? If you know the
> > > number of objects then you can calculate the pages needed which would be
> > > the maximum memory needed?
> >
> > Yes, that would work.
>
> Hmmm... Maybe lets have
>
> unsigned kmem_estimate_pages(struct kmem_cache *slab_cache, int objects)
>
> which would calculate the worst case memory scenario for allocation the
> number of indicated objects?
Perfectly fine with me, Pekka, any objections?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists