netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178307709.2767.19.camel@lappy>
Date:	Fri, 04 May 2007 21:41:49 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, trond.myklebust@....uio.no, tgraf@...g.ch,
	James.Bottomley@...elEye.com, michaelc@...wisc.edu,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, phillips@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] Swap over Networked storage -v12

On Fri, 2007-05-04 at 12:27 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 12:26:51 +0200
> 
> > There is a fundamental deadlock associated with paging;
> 
> I know you'd really like people like myself to review this work, but a
> set of 40 patches is just too much to try and digest at once
> especially when I have other things going on.

I realize this, however I expected you to mainly look at the the 10
network related patches, namely: 11/40 - 20/40.

I know they build upon the previous 10 patches, which are mostly VM, and
you seem to have an interest in that as well, so that would be 20
patches to look at. Still a sizable set.

How would you prefer I present these?

The other patches are NFS and iSCSI, I'd not expect you to review those
in depth.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html