[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070506020051.GA30917@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 22:00:51 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gary Zambrano <zambrano@...adcom.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bcm43xx-dev@...ts.berlios.de, ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: Merging SSB upstream
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:03:17AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote:
> So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's
> time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream.
> Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet.
ACK, unfortunately.
> What do you think? I'd like to merge ssb as-is, although
> the embedded-device parts are not quite finished, yet.
> But they don't interfere with the non-embedded parts used
> by b44 and the bcm43xx PCI cards.
How much testing have you (and others) done w/ b44? I had to remove
the b44 ssb changes from fedora because a) users reported problems;
and b) I was more worried about wireless than b44+ssb. (sorry!)
So, has anyone been using b44 in -mm?
> So we _could_ remove the ssb-mips code, but I don't like to
> do that for better maintainability. It doesn't hurt anyone IMO.
I guess I don't see a problem w/ merging the mips part, as long as the
b44 part has been thoroughly tested. I wonder if Ralf has an opinion?
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@...driver.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists