netdev - Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070508155201.GA1251@xi.wantstofly.org>
Date:	Tue, 8 May 2007 17:52:01 +0200
From:	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	Alexey Zaytsev <alexey.zaytsev@...il.com>,
	Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Michael Jones <mlj28@....ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel IXP4xx network drivers v.2 - Ethernet and HSS

On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 05:28:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:

> > I was always curious, why do people want to run ixp4xx in LE mode? What
> > are the benefits that overweight the obvious performance degradation?
> 
> Debian is indeed a valid reason.
> I wonder if it would be much work to create BE Debian as well.

There _is_ an ARM BE version of Debian.

It's not an official port, but it's not maintained any worse than
the 'official' LE ARM Debian port is.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html