netdev - RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178617538.18162.54.camel@johannes.berg>
Date:	Tue, 08 May 2007 11:45:38 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
Cc:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
	"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jgarzik@...ox.com, cramerj <cramerj@...el.com>,
	"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
	"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>,
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior

Somehow I didn't see the mails inbetween. Let me think.

On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 17:33 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:

> Jamal, as you said, the wireless subsystem uses an interim workaround
> (the extra netdev approach) to achieve hardware packets scheduling. But
> with Peter's patch, the wireless stack doesn't need the workaround
> anymore. This is the actual fix.

Actually, we still need multiple devices for virtual devices? Or which
multiple devices are you talking about here?

johannes

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (191 bytes)