[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20070509.143925.25157363.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 14:39:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linkwatch bustage in git-net
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 14:11:03 -0700
> On Wed, 09 May 2007 00:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> >
> > Thanks for working this out, applied and pushed to net-2.6.git
>
> I'm all confused. I just pulled your tree and I see in the log
>
>
> commit 4cba637dbb9a13706494a1c85174c8e736914010
> Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Wed May 9 00:17:30 2007 -0700
>
> [NET] link_watch: Always schedule urgent events
>
>
> and
>
>
> commit fe47cdba83b3041e4ac1aa1418431020a4afe1e0
> Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Tue May 8 23:22:43 2007 -0700
>
> [NET] link_watch: Eliminate potential delay on wrap-around
>
>
> but in the actual diff and in the checked-out tree I see no sign of the
> earlier patch (fe47cdba83b3041e4ac1aa1418431020a4afe1e0). I have the old
> code:
>
> /* If we wrap around we'll delay it by at most HZ. */
> if (delay > HZ)
> delay = 0;
>
>
> where'd it go?
Look at the two individual changes, Herbert implemented the
delay calculations different in the second changeset. So
the code is much different there now.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists