netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] AFS: Implement basic file write support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20070509092853.65619a35.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 9 May 2007 09:28:53 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] AFS: Implement basic file write support

On Wed, 09 May 2007 12:07:39 +0100 David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > set_page_dirty() will set I_DIRTY_PAGES only.  ie: the inode has dirty
> > pagecache data.
> > 
> > To tell the VFS that the inode itself is dirty one needs to run
> > mark_inode_dirty().
> 
> But what's the difference in this case?  I don't need to write the inode back
> per se, and the inode attributes can be updated by the mechanism of data
> storage.
> 

Ah.  Well if you don't need to write the inode back then sure, there
shouldn't be a need to mark it dirty.  That's what I was asking ;)

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html