netdev - Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize return value of qdisc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1178799661.4074.20.camel@localhost>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 08:21:01 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, krkumar2@...ibm.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Optimize return value of qdisc_restart

On Thu, 2007-10-05 at 04:55 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 21:50:39 +1000
> 

> T_SCHED]: Rationalise return value of qdisc_restart
> > 
> > The current return value scheme and associated comment was invented
> > back in the 20th century when we still had that tbusy flag.  Things
> > have changed quite a bit since then (even Tony Blair is moving on
> > now, not to mention the new French president).
> > 
> > All we need to indicate now is whether the caller should continue
> > processing the queue.  Therefore it's sufficient if we return 0 if
> > we want to stop and non-zero otherwise.
> > 
> > This is based on a patch by Krishna Kumar.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> 
> Fair enough, patch applied :-)

Ok, see if this makes sense:

CPU0                 CPU1 (holding qdisc running)
  .                    |
  .                    |
  .                    + grab qlock
  .                    |
  .                    | deq pkt
  .                    + release qlock
  .                    + grab txlock
  .                    |  send pkt
  .                    + release txlock
  .                    + grab qlock
   has pktX            | (NEW: qlen = 0); return 0 instead of -1
   waiting for qlock   + release qlock
  + grab qlock         |
  |                    + find that return code is 0
  | enq pkt X          + release qdisc running
  |                    |
  + release qlock      | ==> outta here

pkt X is stuck unless some event happens such as a new pkt arrival. 
In other words it sits there for an indeterminate period.

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html