netdev - Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46436274.4060804@hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 May 2007 11:20:36 -0700
From:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>
To:	Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Cc:	Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits

Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Rick Jones wrote:
> 
>>>It is the reverse - GSO will segment one super-packet just before calling
>>>the driver so that the stack is traversed only once. In my case, I am
>>>trying to send out multiple skbs, possibly small packets, in one shot.
>>>GSO will not help for small packets.
>>
>>If there are small packets that implies small sends, which suggests that
>>they would be coalesced either implicitly by the Nagle algorithm or
>>explicitly with TCP_CORK no?
>>
>>rick jones
>>-
> 
> 
> May be for TCP?  What about other protocols?

There are other protocols?-)  True, UDP, and I suppose certain modes of SCTP 
might be sending streams of small packets, as might TCP with TCP_NODELAY set.

Do they often queue-up outside the driver?

rick jones
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html