netdev - Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.21-stable] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of Routing Header processing.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070511162243.GC3516@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date:	Fri, 11 May 2007 09:22:43 -0700
From:	Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To:	YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 
	<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.21-stable] [IPV6]: Restore semantics of
	Routing Header processing.

* YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 (yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org) wrote:
> The "fix" for emerging security threats was overkill and it broke
> basic semantic of IPv6 routing header processing.  We should assume
> RT0 (or even RT2, depends on configuration) as "unknown" RH type so
> that we
> - silently ignore the routing header if segleft == 0
> - or, send ICMPv6 Parameter Problem message back to the sender,
>   otherwise.

Does that mean this one has received testing and is good for -stable
now, or does it need some bake time?

thanks,
-chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html