[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178850215.4074.6.camel@localhost>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 22:23:35 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@...el.com>
Cc: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
jgarzik@...ox.com, cramerj <cramerj@...el.com>,
"Kok, Auke-jan H" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>,
"Leech, Christopher" <christopher.leech@...el.com>,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: RE: [PATCH] IPROUTE: Modify tc for new PRIO multiqueue behavior
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 09:58 +0800, Zhu Yi wrote:
>
> Good, we agree on this.
Good start.
> Now let's solve the problem.
>
Lets take it slowly, because i think i wasnt getting anywhere with
Peter. See if you make sense of what i am saying maybe we can make
progress.
> When the low priority ring buffer is full in the hardware, will you
> suppose the driver call netif_stop_queue() or not?
Yes, I will.
With a note: This is precisely what i have been saying all along
in my posting. I explained my reasoning; if you missed the why I think i
should write it up.
So in order to make progress - i am going to not respond to the rest of
the email; tell me if you dont understand me and i will do a write up
hopefully tommorow or over the weekend.
Or tell me you understand me and disagree because of ....
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists