[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1178885709.4093.32.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:15:09 -0400
From: jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
Ian McDonald <ian.mcdonald@...di.co.nz>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Rick Jones <rick.jones2@...com>,
Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] New driver API to speed up small packets xmits
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 15:53 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> As I said there might be another lock, if interrupt handler is shared,
> or registers are accessed, but it is privite driver's business, which
> has nothing in common with stack itself.
Ok, we are saying the same thing then. eg in e1000 that would be
tx_ring->lock or something along those lines.
> Stack just queues an skb,
> which, after detached from the tx queue by driver, just does not exist
> for stack anymore. It can be dequeed with rcu protection even.
in my case i had a dev->blist where the stack queued. You really want to
avoid requeueing altogether.
The trick i used is to have the driver tell you how many packets you can
pull off the qdisc.
cheers,
jamal
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists