netdev - Re: Problem with xfrm (ipsec) as state/spi selected solely on outer ip addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200705141100.21424.joakim.koskela@hiit.fi>
Date:	Mon, 14 May 2007 11:00:21 +0300
From:	Joakim Koskela <joakim.koskela@...t.fi>
To:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with xfrm (ipsec) as state/spi selected solely on outer ip addresses

On Friday 11 May 2007 19:13:41 Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Joakim Koskela wrote:
> > I'm running a system where there might be multiple simultenously
> > active ipsec states between two hosts (ipv6, but guess it applies to
> > v4 as well) where the outer ip is the same for all states, but the
> > inner differ (using beet mode).
> >
> > The problem is that after establishing these states, it seems that the
> > one associated with outgoing traffic is selected solely by the outer
> > address (the first state matching the outer ip-pairs is used), which
> > usually results in the wrong spi and the packet being dropped at the
> > receiver.
>
> This should only pick states matching the flow:
>
> if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID) {
>
>
>         if (!xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, family) ||
>             !security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
>                 continue;
> ...
>
> I'm probably misunderstanding your configuration, could you post the
> SA selectors and addresses that result in an incorrect state being
> picked?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Oh, your right. I wasn't setting the netmask correctly (zero) for the 
selectors, making them match anything. Sorry for the waste of time!

br, j

-- 
Joakim Koskela
Helsinki Institute for Information Technology (HIIT)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html