[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <464872E2.2030502@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:32:02 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jkrzyszt@....icnet.pl>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, horms@...ge.net.au,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [IPV4] LVS: Allow to send ICMP unreachable responses when real-servers
are removed
Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>
>>> BTW, there doesn't even seem to be a spot where IPVS calls
>>> ip_route_output with the source address set. What exactly is this
>>> needed for?
>>
>>
>> I suppose he has a patch to make use of it, but was waiting
>> for this route.c change to go in first.
>
>
> If you mean me, the answer is no, I do not have any patch making use of
> the change in question. What I have is rather a complicated method of
> notifying udp clients on communication problems before they are
> redirected to a new real server. My method needs some IPVS related
> patches, but ICMP port unreachable messages are not generated inside
> IPVS code, they are just sent, with help of the patch in question, from
> udp_input() or netfilter REJECT.
Both use icmp_send(), which should always pick a local source, so I
don't understand why this change was needed. Could you describe
the specific case when the packet generated by icmp_send() does
not have a local source?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists